Salt is an absolutely essential ingredient in most processed food. So it's no surprise that the food industry is starting to make a little hay of new research concluding that too little salt in the diet might be as harmful as too much.
But the industry so far is treading carefully. There are two reasons for that: first, because at this point it's impossible for food producers to know what to do with this new data, all of it published recently by the New England Journal of Medicine; and second, because over the years, the food industry has created a whole thriving market for 'low sodium' products. Any kind of sweeping statement on salt would hurt one part of the industry or another.
Three studies were published. Two of them concluded that underconsumption of salt might be harmful. A third basically matched the findings of earlier research, showing that cardiovascular risk rises with increases in sodium consumption of over 2 grams per day - the maximum recommended by the World Health Organization (that's the equivalent of 5 grams of salt, since salt is about 40% of salt). The first two have drawn criticism because of the methodology used, but those are the ones the media picked up on - which is not surprising given that the media love counterintuitive science stories. The third study was far more rigorous and far less assailable.
All three studies are certainly legitimate - peer reviewed and published in a prestigious journal. And there's not much science behind how what researchers called 'aggressively low' salt targets might affect human health. But the first two were observational and found only an association between such low sodium intake and cardiovascular risk, not a cause-and-effect relationship. More study is surely needed, but none of the research published last week counters what is the overwhelming (though not universal) scientific consensus: that in general we eat too much salt and that it poses health risks, particularly hypertension.
After the research was published, the Grocery Manufacturers Association called for more study of the question, basically echoing what the New England Journal of Medicine itself said. The GMA was careful not to specifically endorse (or dispute) the new research, which is not surprising given the quandary it presents. The problem can be seen within the GMA's statement itself. It's almost an internal dialogue:
GMA members have been reformulating products for decades to provide lower sodium options to help consumers achieve healthy sodium intake levels. Our industry has reformulated thousands of products to reduce sodium content and meet consumer taste preferences. The industry has also developed a wide variety of reduced, low or no-added sodium products to help consumers follow recommendations of their health care professionals.
And while we are committed to continuing in our efforts to provide consumers with these lower sodium product options, we think that the articles such as those recently published in the New England Journal of Medicine warrant serious consideration by some public health authorities. In particular, the article by O'Donnell and colleagues further adds to the scientific evidence that low sodium consumption, at levels recommended by public health organizations, may actually increase cardiovascular risk. Therefore, it is vitally important that we undertake definitive studies to resolve the health impacts, both positive and adverse, of low sodium consumption to ensure public health interventions aimed at lowering sodium consumption provide benefit and do not cause harm.
In addition, the U.S. Federal government needs to conduct an independent credible reassessment of the Dietary Reference Intakes, which form the basis for current sodium intake recommendations. This reassessment is critical to establishing public health policy that does not harm the health of US consumers.
The food industry depends heavily on salt, and as long as it wants to sell us processed foods, it always will. But it also has created a whole sub-industry devoted to creating and marketing low-sodium products. According to data released last year by MarketsandMarkets, the ' salt reduction market ' - which includes substitute ingredients and various manipulations of salt crystals to reduce their sodium content - is growing by about 11% a year and will surpass $1 billion by 2018.
Entities 0 Name: New England Journal of Medicine Count: 3 1 Name: GMA Count: 2 2 Name: US Count: 2 3 Name: World Health Organization Count: 1 4 Name: O'Donnell Count: 1 5 Name: Grocery Manufacturers Association Count: 1 Related 0 Url: http://ift.tt/1tvQO5o Title: Dash of Salt Does No Harm. Extremes Are the Enemy. Description: For years, we have known that diets high in salt can be bad for people with high blood pressure. A study published recently in The New England Journal of Medicine confirmed this fact. It monitored more than 100,000 people in 18 countries and found that people who consumed more sodium generally had significantly higher blood pressures than those who did not.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar